Showing posts with label iapt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iapt. Show all posts

Sunday, January 3, 2016

bend it like IAPT

Bending rules of IAPT and using them to meet vested interests have become norm these days as it suits the larger interests of few people. IAPT this year clearly laid out the criterion of eligibility of NSEJS according to which students of classes 9 and 10 can only appear in junior science Olympiad. By having set this rule IAPT meant that students of Junior classes ( like 7 and 8 ) should be not exposed to this grind at very early stage which was a very appropriate logic. However IAPT and HBCSE never understood the stakes of few people in these exams because in Senior Olympiad no such things were mentioned and it is generally assumed for class 11 and 12 students in some special cases even class 9 and 10 students can appear for it. But came to know stories of class 7 and 8 students clearing the Senior Science Olympiads. It raises very important questions


1. When IAPT and HBCSE have the objections with the fact that class 7 and 8 students should not appear in NSEJS and how come the same students be allowed to appear in Sr Science Olympiads.

2.   Every state have different cutoff and few people are taking the advantage of this arbitrage and making students appear from the places where cutoff is low irrespective of the fact that where the student is studying. This is vicious trend and soon clearing Olympiad will become more manipulation game rather intelligence. 

Monday, December 28, 2015

An appeal to IAPT and HBCSE officials for removing the irregularities


To,
The Director,
128/2 J.P. Naik Road,
I.I.E. Campus, Kothrud,
Near Solaris Club,
Pune (Maharashtra) - 411038

Dear Sir,

Sub: Request for correcting glaring inequities in the system of NSE Stage –I Examinations- mis-use /manipulation of the system by some people and institutions

Please refer to the above.
I, as father/ ward of my son [Roll No            ], seek to bring to your notice a highly inequitable and unjust rule / basis of Stage –I selections in NSEJS , NSEB,NSEC,NSEA which will convince any impartial  person that the said Rule is not made in furtherance of the object for which the Science Olympiad competition is supposed to be conducted, but for some either ulterior motive or on the basis of a consideration which has lost its relevance in the changed circumstances.
2.         Your Organization is apparently conducting Olympiad related tests/ competition to bring the talented students of science to focus and promote the education of science in the Country for the betterment of the society and nation at large. In spite of this highly laudable object, you are still caught in the retrograde argument of reservation for various States / Regions of the country. The result is that while students with inferior talent get the opportunity to participate  in subsequent rounds  of Olympiad , the  better ones from other States are overlooked. For example: the cut off marks for students of Rajasthan is 150 and for students of Uttar Pradesh – it is 109.
3.         My son –Master                           , student of   standard at Kota Rajasthan appeared at NSEJS- Stage -I Exam from Kota and in spite of having obtained [   ] marks was not eligible for participating in latter rounds of Olympiad whereas students who got much lesser marks ( from other States) will get the opportunity to do so. Such inequity is extremely disappointing and discouraging for the students and parents alike. It was all the more shocking when it was learnt that other class mates of my son who are enrolled in schools of Kota but appeared from Uttar Pradesh to take the advantage of the lesser cut off of UP and higher  number of seats and got selected with lower marks.
4.        It has come to light that APPEJAY School Noida (Center code UP011) unlawfully enrolled students from other States (especially from Rajasthan) who appeared from their school. In fact, a detailed scrutiny will bring to light  the name of a coaching institute of Kota who masterminded this exercise.
5.          In view of the obvious manipulation, I request you to make me available the following details, at the earliest:
 (i) Please provide the copy of the registration forms of all students enrolled at APPEJAY School Noida (Center code UP011):
(ii) Please provide the details regarding the various inspections/ Checks carried out by your organization to ascertain the correctness of form filled by students.  
That I am ready to pay cost for the documents mentioned above.
6.         I am sure that as a responsible organization, you will provide the above details to me and help restoring the credibility of the system. An investigation by your organization, on above lines, will also bring to light the facts very easily, if done honestly.
7.         Further, if your organization is interested in avoiding such manipulations in future, the best course is eliminate Statewise quota, otherwise this manipulation  will spread far and wide.
7.         I understand that it is easy for a non-governmental organization to shrug off all responsibility and disown any accountability. But it is for inferior organizations and not for an organizations of TEACHERS like yours who are supposedly there to foster higher ethical and moral values in the society.  
8.         In view of above injustice, I am committed to escalate this matter  to the highest levels of  all forums of government, judiciary and social media, if not redressed at your level,  and ensure that such inequities are not perpetrated , credibility of the system is not eroded and unscrupulous people do not go home with undeserving rewards.
           
                                                                                                  Yours Faithfully



                                                                                                                       



Copy to :
1.        Prof. M. L. Oglapurkar ,  Chief Coordinator (IAPT Examinations),
IAPT Office, Sheela Vihar Colony,
7, Heramb Coop HSG Society,
Near Kimaya Hotel, Karve Road,
Kothrud, Pune 411 038
Email:
 iaptpune@gmail.com
2.        Prof. Anwesh Mazumdar
National Coordinator, Science Olympiads
Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education (TIFR),
V. N. Purav Marg,
Mankhurd, Mumbai 400 088
3.       Hon’ble Minister for Human Resource
Government of India

New Delhi

Thursday, January 16, 2014

IAPT accepts the mistake

It seems IAPT has partially accepted the mistake done by it. Yesterday on 15 Jan it has issued a additional list of NSEC selected students. In this new list 71 more students are selected from India and from Rajasthan 18 are selected. IAPT has earlier checked the answer sheets of all these students with the wrong answer key. IAPT has done the reevaluation after receiving lot of complains , however still it failed to deliver the justice. Many students from Kota who was getting more than the cutoff are still not there in the list. HBCSE should ensure that IAPT does the reevaluation of all students who have sent the complain not only to selected students. 

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Sunday, January 12, 2014

mobile nos needed of HBCSE officials

contact nos needed of Prof. Vijay Singh and Prof. Jayashree Ramadas . Please drop mail at nileshgupt@yahoo.com

Thursday, January 9, 2014

In NSEC OMRs checked with wrong answer key for many centres by IAPT




IAPT has used different paper codes this time. There are lots of centers which are completely missing this time from the IAPT result, especially in NSEC.  In fact cities likes Kota and Jaipur which contribute more than 30% of Rajasthan quota are completely missing from the list. There seems to be a problem in checking the OMR sheet with wrong answer key, for example OMR of paper code A is checked by Answer key of paper code B. Three years back SIERT Udaipur has done the same mistake when they checked the OMRs with wrong answer key and every student who was hoping to get qualified did not figure out in the list. However that time it was easy to figure out because not a single student was selected so when we pointed out the mistakes SIERT accepted and within 7 days, the new results were announced. This time the problem with IAPT is more tricky, wrong OMR checking happened with selected centres that too in few cities. So it is difficult for IAPT to comprehend the problem. What IAPT can do it do take random checking of complains received by it.

It will be prudent thinking to accept the mistakes rather than denying the information. Students working hard has right to know the marks. IAPT and HBCSE will do justice with the talent of the country.

Saturday, January 4, 2014

many more complains of IAPT

I, Samridh Joshi have given NSEC and was expecting 187/240 in UP according to the latest answer key, the cutoff is 159 still I am not selected , same is matter with Utkarsh Rai who was expecting 172 and Rishubh Singh , expecting196-200 who Is a kvpy fellow too. It Is very shocking That we have not been selected and no-one has been selected frm our centre . IT IS MY KIND REQUEST FROM ALL THE STUDENTS THAT YOU PLEASE DISCLOSE OUR MARKS,OMR EVALUATIONS AND REVALUATE IF NECESSARY.LOOKING FORWARD FOR YOUR REPLY .  Many are disappointed and unsatisfied. Details -
Centre -UP386,FIITJEE Lucknow.I have received no response from IAPT AND REQUEST ALL OF YOU TO PLEASE PRESS ON IAPT IN REGARD TO THIS ISSUE WHICH IS SUFFERED BY MANY STUDENTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY.I AM LOOKING FORWARD FOR YOUR REPLY.

Draft of legal notice for IAPT

http://www.scribd.com/doc/195785305/Legal-Notice-to-be-served-to-IAPT

Thursday, January 2, 2014

IAPT mismanages Olympiads




IAPT has recently declared result of NSEs stage 1.  Students have reported lot of irregularities in various Olympiads. Students who were expecting more than cut off are not selected. There is no body in IAPT to answer all this. Students who have put so much labor in preparing for these exams have every right to know, the marks scored by them in the various Olympiads. In the past too IAPT has acted as a dictator and least bothered about the transparency in conducting the exams.

Cities like Jaipur and kota which contribute every good number of selections in NSEC every year is completely missing from the list this time. Bikaner and JNV bundi has surprisingly more than 10 selections in NSEC; such anomalies clearly reflect the mismanagement of IAPT..

Sunday, January 13, 2013

IAPT and HBCSE double Standards in NSE result



 Let me take the example of NSEJS first. The numbers have swallowed since the first list declared by IAPT to final list declared by HBCSE. For Example in NSEJS there were 17 students who were not present in the first list released by IAPT. Out of which some students are last year awardees which is understood, but rest of the students did not figure out in the first list released by IAPT. It has done some adjustments and the number of selections has increased after that. This has been done in a very silent way and IAPT and HBCSE in tight lipped about this increased no of students. This has been done in every Olympiad. It is time these people should be taken to court for doing things at their whims and fancies. There could be reasons for this.


1.     1.   There could be some deserving candidates who protested when there were not selected on rechecking it was found that the mistake was from IAPT.( if you have not protested then you have no chance)
2.     2.   Some students would have selected to oblige some body.

3.     3.   IAPT and HBCSE have their own different measures of selecting the candidates after all tests are done.


IAPT and HBCSE are duty bound to come with explanation for each candidate who wwas not there in the first released by IAPT.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

IAPT mismanages olympaids

It has come to notice that it has left lot of OMRs unchecked , now the students who were expecting good marks are complaining. IAPT officials are waking up and checking the OMRs and declaring the results. so lot of students are adding up in the list every day

Thursday, January 3, 2013

IAPT lacks transparency

Recently IAPT has declared the Olympiads stage1 results. The results seem to be controversial since IAPT has not brought any transparency in declaring the results. Most of the bright students roll nos are missing from the list released so far. IAPT should declare the marks of all the students who have appeared in the exam.
On my personal visit to IAPT Pune I tried to reason with the Prof. M. L. Ogalapurkar but he was not ready to listen. IAPT it seems is has also cancelled various exam centers. Ironically IAPT is not ready to answer any of the questions. I will urge parents and students to call officials and ask the reasons directly.

Monday, December 31, 2012

WANTED : contact no of IAPT officials

Prof. R. M. Dharkar           ; Chief Co-ordinator of IAPT exams.
Prof.  M. L. Ogalapurkar, :  Co-ordinator, NSEP. NSEC, NSEB
Prof. J. P. Gadre           : Co-ordinator, NSEA NSEJS